Luke Hasskamp is a partner at Bona Law PC, where he focuses on antitrust litigation, class action defense, healthcare and pharmaceutical litigation, and complex business disputes. He has litigated in federal and state courts, administrative proceedings, and arbitration, handling matters across the full arc—from early dispositive motions through discovery, trial, and appeal.
Luke’s antitrust practice spans both sides of the docket. On the plaintiff side, he has argued Sherman Act monopolization appeals, litigated group boycott and conspiracy-to- monopolize claims, and represented clients facing exclusionary conduct by dominant firms and monopsonists. On the defense side, he has defended clients against class action antitrust claims in class action and multi-district litigation and complex commercial matters.
Luke has significant federal and state appellate experience, having briefed and argued matters before the Second, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits, as well as the California and Minnesota Courts of Appeal.
Before entering private practice, Luke clerked for three federal judges: Judge Kermit E. Bye of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Judge Manuel L. Real of the Central District of California, and Judge Robert G. James of the Western District of Louisiana. He brings that judicial perspective to every matter — with a disciplined focus on the facts and legal issues that actually move the needle, from the earliest stages of litigation.
Prior to joining Bona Law, Luke practiced at Kanner & Whiteley in New Orleans and Robins Kaplan in Minneapolis.
He has also served as a legal consultant to CBS’s show NCIS, advising on federal court procedure for a 2026 episode.
Education
J.D., Loyola Law School, 2011
Dean’s Honor List | St. Thomas More Law Honor Society | Research Assistant for Professor Allan Ides | Entertainment Law Review, Executive Board Member | Moot Court
B.A., Carleton College, 2003
Cum Laude
Clerkships
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for Judge Kermit E. Bye
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California for Judge Manuel L. Real
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana for Judge Robert G. James
Admissions
California, 2011
Minnesota, 2013
Northern District of California
Southern District of California
Central District of California
District of Colorado
District of Minnesota
District of North Dakota
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Fourth Circuit
Fifth Circuit
Eighth Circuit
Ninth Circuit
Tenth Circuit
Supreme Court of the United States
Representative Matters
- Argued Chase Manufacturing v. Johns Manville Corp., 84 F.4th 1157 (10th Cir. 2023), a Sherman Act Section 2 monopolization case against a near-100% market monopolist, in which the Tenth Circuit reversed summary judgment for the client.
- Argued Drabinsky v. Actors’ Equity Association, 106 F.4th 206 (2d Cir. 2024), presenting a novel first-impression question on the scope of the statutory labor exemption to the Sherman Act and whether it constitutes an affirmative defense — a case in which the Second Circuit resolved a circuit split, with the AFL-CIO as amicus.
- Argued Western Star Hospital Authority, Inc. v. City of Richmond, 986 F.3d 354 (4th Cir. 2021), a Sherman Act Section 2 case challenging a municipal monopoly over the non-emergency ambulance market, presenting questions on the scope of state action immunity under the Parker doctrine.
- Defended a Japanese capacitor manufacturer against class action Sherman Act claims in federal multi-district litigation (In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation).
- Counsel in PharmacyChecker.com v. NABP et al., an antitrust case against pharmaceutical associations for conspiring to eliminate online pharmacy competition.
- Represented a nutrition supplement company in federal litigation involving Lanham Act false advertising claims (Ariix, LLC v. NutriSearch Corp.).
- Represented a data analytics company in group boycott and conspiracy-to-monopolize claims in the District of Colorado.
- Litigated antitrust claims against a major wireless carrier on behalf of a spectrum technology company, involving allegations of monopsony power and exclusionary conduct. (T-Mobile v. WCO Spectrum)
- Counsel for a defendant in In re Turkey Antitrust Litigation, a nationwide price- fixing class action MDL involving the turkey processing industry.
- Served as outside litigation counsel for the California Attorney General in People v. Vitol, a price-fixing case against global gasoline trading firms.
- Served as outside litigation counsel for the Louisiana Attorney General in healthcare and pharmaceutical litigation.
- Represented insurers in affirmative fraud and civil RICO litigation involving overbilling by hospital and laboratory defendants.
- Represented insurers in a national civil RICO class action involving pharmaceutical manufacturers of testosterone replacement therapy products.
- Represented clients in a national antitrust consumer class action involving pharmaceutical manufacturers of Adderall XR.
- Represented a class of consumers in set-top box antitrust litigation.
Publications
Luke has written extensively on many topics, including:
- Emerging Antitrust Questions in Youth Sports
- Niesen Appeal Tests Antitrust Limits Of Pricing And Bundling
- Baseballs curious exemption from Federal Antitrust Laws (Part 1) (Part 2)
- The MLB's alleged conspiracy against the Minor League
- State action immunity
- The PGA Tour and the Premier Golf League
- Tribal sovereign immunity
- Various issues in appellate litigation
- Unpacking Antitrust: What Is a Joint Venture?
Articles
- Bona Law Files Ninth Circuit Appeal on Behalf of Texas-based Specialized Blood Plasma Clinic and its Principal Against SEC
- Can You Sue for False Advertising Over Fake Reviews and Rigged “Independent” Ratings?
- How to Appeal a Case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
- Nielsen Appeal Tests Antitrust Limits Of Pricing And Bundling
- Potential Changes Coming to Requirements for Notices of Appeal in Federal Courts
- Practice Guide: How to Appeal a Case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- The Basics of California State Appellate Procedure
- Tribal Sovereign Immunity: A Defense Available to Individuals